Rhind Mathematical
Papyrus (6 of 8) / © 1979-2001 by Franz Gnaedinger, Zurich, fg(a)seshat.ch,
fgn(a)bluemail.ch / www.seshat.ch
Rhind 1 / Rhind 2 / Rhind 3 / Rhind 4 / Rhind 5 / Rhind 6 / Rhind 7 / Rhind 8
RMP 46 and 47
Two square containers measure
10 by 10
by 3 '3 royal cubits
10 by 10
by 5 royal cubits
I am assuming that the floor of each container measures 10 by 10
royal cubits. Now let me inscribe an octagon in that square:
A
a b B
h c
g d
D
f e C
Square ABCD
AB = BC = CD = DA = 10 royal cubits
inscribed octagon abcdefgh ab=bc=cd=de=ef=fg=gh=ha
A side of the square measures 10 royal cubits or 70 palms or 280
fingers. How long is the side of the regular octagon within the frame of the
square?
1
1 2
2 3 4
5 7
10
12 17
24
29 41
58
70 99
140
169 ...
...
side of octagon side of circumscribed square
7 5
+ 7 +
5 = 12
10 7
+ 10 +
7 = 24
17 12
+ 17 +
12 = 41
24 17
+ 12 +
17 = 58
41 29
+ 41 +
29 = 99
58
41 +
58 + 41 = 140
By doubling the numbers of the last line we find:
side of octagon 116
side of square 82+116+82 = 280
The side of the square measures 10 royal cubits or 70 palms or 280
fingers, hence the side of the inscribed octagon measures practically 116 fingers or 4 cubits
1 palm.
Now let me go a step further and transform the square containers
into granaries of the same volume but in the shape of prisms. The floor of
these containers is given by the above octagon. The area of an octagon is
smaller than that of the square. Accordingly, the granaries will be taller. How
do we calculate their heights? Again by means of the above number pattern:
height of granary based on square 10
24 58 140
...
height of granary based on octagon 12
29 70 169
...
The former square containers were 3 '3 and 5 royal cubits tall.
The new granaries on the base of the octagon are taller. By using the first
numbers 10 and 12 we find the heights:
3 '3 royal cubits x '10 x 12 = 4 royal
cubits
5 royal cubits x '10 x 12
= 6 royal cubits
Very simple numbers. - Now let us consider only the second
granary. Wishing to get a more accurate volume I use the numbers 140 and 169:
former height
5 royal cubits or 140 fingers
new height
140f x '140 x 169 = 169f = 6 cubits 1 finger
Calculating the area of the inner wall (right parallelepiped and
prism):
base
10 c x 10 c height 5 royal cubits
periphery
4 x 10 c = 40 royal cubits
area of wall
40 c x 5 c = 200 square cubits
side of octagon 116 fingers or 4 cubits 1 palm
height
169 fingers or 6 cubits 1 finger
periphery
8 x 116 fingers = 928 fingers or 33 cubits 1 palm
area of wall
= 33 '7 c x 6 '28 c = 200
'28 '196 cc
The walls of the two granaries have practically the same area.
Even better: they have exactly the same area (the minor error in the above
result is due to the margins of error in the values '41 of 58 and '140 of 169
used for the calculation of the octagon).
Imagine a pair of ideal granaries with vertical walls. One granary
is based on a square. The other granary is based on the regular octagon
inscribed in the square. If the granaries have the same capacity, their walls
have the same area. Or if the inner walls have the same area, the two granaries
have the same volume.
RMP 48
Problem no. 48 of the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus contains a famous
drawing of a square with an inscribed octagon:
A a b B
h
c
g
d
D f e C
Square ABCD
irregular octagon abcdefgh
A-B = B-C = C-D = D-A = 9 royal cubits
A-a = a-b = b-B = B-c = ... = g-h = h-A = 3
royal cubits
grid
3+3+3 by 3+3+3 royal cubits
area square
9x9 = 81 square cubits
area octagon
9x9 - 2x3x3 = 63 square cubits
A circle inscribed in the square would have about the same area as
the octagon. This generates the value 3 '9 for re:
'4 x 9 rc x 9 rc x 3 '9 = 63
square cubits
63 square cubits are about 8 by 8 royal cubits. From this we
derive a well known formula: if the diameter of a circle measures 9 units and
if the side of a square measures 8 units the circle and the square have roughly
the same area. This formula generates the value '81 of 256 for re, or nearly '6
of 19 or 3 '6, according to a crosswise multiplication:
256 x 6 = 1536 81 x 19 = 1539
So we found the values 3 '9 and 3 '6. The equally simple values in
between are 3 '8 and 3 '7
RMP 49
A rectangle measures 2 by 10 khet or 200 by 1,000 royal cubits
while its area measures 200,000 square cubits. Can you transform the rectangle
into a regular octagon of about the same area?
circumscribed square 492 by 492 royal cubits
partition
12 times 12+17+12 royal cubits
grid
144+204+144 by 144+204+144 royal cubits
side of octagon 204 royal cubits
area
200,592 square cubits
RMP 50
Ahmes calculates the area of a circle whose diameter measures 9
khet = 900 royal cubits. By using his well known formula he obtains 8 by 8 khet
= 64 square khet = 64 aroures or setat = 640,000 square cubits.
Advanced learners may try to solve a more demanding task:
transforming the circle into a regular octagon of the same area using the
following extended number pattern:
1
1 2 2
2
3 4
6
5 7
10 14
12 17
24 34
29 41
58 82
70 99
140 198
169 239
338 478
The squared side of a regular octagon and the area of the same
octagon maintain a relation that can be approximated by means of the above
numbers:
side x side
12 17 29
41 70 99
... square cubits
area octagon
58 82 140
198 338 478
... square cubits
The number re may be chosen from the following sequence:
3
(plus 22) 25 47
69 91 113
135 157 179
201 223
1
(plus 7) 8
15 22 29
36 43 50
57 64 71
245
267 289 311
333 355 377
399
78
85 92 99
106 113 120 127
Two values contain the number 99: '99 of 478 and '99 of 311. Now
the area of a regular octagon and the one of a circle may be defined like this:
side x side x '99 x 478 radius x radius x '99 x 311
The octagon and the circle have the same area, therefore:
side x side x '99 x 478 =
radius x radius x '99 x 311
The diameter of the circle measures 9 khet or 900 royal cubits
while the radius measures 450 royal cubits. Now we obtain:
side x side
= 450 cubits x 450 cubits x 311 x
'478
side x side
= practically 131,752 square
cubits
By consulting a table of square numbers you will find
362 x 362
= 131,044 ---
708 less than 131,752
363 x 363
= 131,769 ---
only 17 more than 131,752
364 x 364
= 132,496 ---
744 more than 131,752
The number 363 is a good solution to our problem. Hence a circle
of the diameter 9 khet and a regular octagon of the side length 363 royal
cubits have practically the same area.
grid
770+1089+770 by 770+1089+770 '3
royal cubits
RMP 51
Ahmes calculates the area of a triangle whose base measures 4 khet
and its height 10 khet, generating an area of 20 square khet = 20 aroures =
200,000 square cubits. This area can be transformed into a regular octagon (see
RMP 49):
grid
144+204+144 by 144+204+144 royal cubits
side
204 royal cubits area 200,592 square cubits
The drawing of RMP 51 shows a triangle a base measuring 4 khet,
while its height measurement is given as 13 khet. In this case the area
measures 260,000 square cubits, while the regular octagon of roughly the same
area has the following measurements:
grid
164+232+164 by 164+232+164 royal cubits
side
232 royal cubits area 259,808 square cubits
RMP 52
This problem concerns a trapezoid whose base measures 6 khet, its
upper side 4 khet and its height 20 khet. Its area is 100 aroures or 1,000,000
square cubits. Transform that area into a regular octagon by using an
alternative number pattern:
2
1 4
3
5 6
8
11 16
19 27
38
46 65
92
322 455
644
grid
322+455+322 by 322+455+322 royal cubits
side octagon
455 royal cubits area 1,000,433 sc
Rhind 1 / Rhind 2 / Rhind 3 / Rhind 4 / Rhind 5 / Rhind 6 / Rhind 7 / Rhind 8